The British gay rights lobbying group, Stonewall, not long ago renewed its call for the ban on lesbians and gay men in the armed forces to be overturned. It warned that a successful appeal to the European Court of Human Rights would cost the government an estimated £ 32 million in legal fees and compensation payments to dismissed homosexual military personnel. "The patriotic course is for the British government to take action. This sort of money could buy a battalion or keep one of our frigates running for a year," said Angela Mason of Stonewall.

      Such a statement sums up the way the just demand for an end to homophobic discrimination by the armed forces has increasingly become an unjustifiable endorsement of militarism and war.

      The experience of being marginalised by society as "abnormal" and "deviant" ought to give us queers a more critical attitude towards all social institutions, including the military. Instead of blithely assuming that everything straight is wonderful, we should have a healthy scepticism towards straight culture.


Onward queer soldiers. Kill! Kill! Kill!

      No hetero institution is more deserving of our scepticism than the armed forces. It

      Above all else, the military is a straight institution. It is organised and dominated by the hetero majority. Part of the function of the military is the defence of a society ruled by straights (and by big business). It serves straight interests and upholds the macho straight values of violence and homophobia. Everything about the military in inimical to queer freedom: hierarchy, domination, prejudice, aggression, conformity, and authoritarianism.

      Moreover, the military is an instrument of State power. The State is homophobic, enforcing legal discrimination against lesbian and gay people. As a part of the repressive apparatus of the State, the armed forces embody this antigay discrimination, banning queers from the military and forcing out those it discovers within its ranks. In defending the State, the military also implicitly defends the anti-queer repression of the State, including the unequal age of consent, the arrest of gay men for victimless cruising, the ban on the promotion of homosexuality by local authorities, (Section 28), the denial of legal recognition for queer partnerships, and the lack of redress against homophobic discrimination in housing and employment.


The duty to defy a homophobic state

      Lesbians and gay men have a right, and even a responsibility, to refuse allegiance to a homophobic State and its homophobic military system. Faced with unjust laws that discriminate against homosexuals, queers are duty-bound to deny legitimacy to the straight governing elite and to withdraw all consent and cooperation from governmental institutions such as the armed forces.

      According to liberal theory, rights carry with them responsibilities. But in the absence of civil and human rights, the duty of reciprocal responsibility ceases to exist. This means that we queers are under no obligation to join the military to protect those who refuse to protect us. Instead there is an onus on us to withhold our loyalty from the institutions of a homophobic State, such as the armed forces, and to do everything in our power to sabotage the straight system which treats us as second-class citizens. You don't have to be a queer revolutionary to realise this, just a homo with a bit of common-sense and self-respect.


The tradition of civil disobedience

      The idea of queer noncompliance with homophobic institutions, such as the military, is rooted in the civil disobedience tradition of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King. They argued that unjust laws must be broken, not obeyed. When governments deny human rights, those excluded from full citizenship have a moral right to rebel against tyrannical rulers. These principles are just as relevant for lesbians and gay men today in Britain as they were in the past for the Indian independence movement and the US black civil rights struggle.

      The armed forces do not respect gay civil rights. Why, then, should we enlist and serve? Is there any reason for queers to give a damn about the fate of the straight State?

      We homos (and our straight allies) have no obligation to defend the fraudulent system that denies us equality. On the contrary, queer self-defence requires that we subvert and destroy the hetero institutions that hold us down.

      Collusion with a homophobic State and homophobic armed forces is collusion with antigay discrimination. To do the bidding of those who victimise us betrays the cause of queer freedom. That's why all queers everywhere have a responsibility to refuse collaboration with the oppressive military system. By so doing, we can help strike a blow for lesbian and gay emancipation, and against militarism and war.


Link to British Army

Link to Royal Navy

Link to Royal Air Force

Link to Ministry of Defence


Previous item OutRage! Home Page I Can See Queerly Now Queer Intelligence Queer History Links to other Sites Next item

©1996-1997 OutRage! London
URL: http://www.RoseCottage.me.uk/OutRage-archives/qimilit.htm
Last modified: 23-September-1999